Roger Scruton on Kant and the Iraq War

Roger Scruton argues that Kant’s perpetual Peace would have supported intervention against Iraq: “the violence must be proportional to the threat, and its aim must be to bring about a lasting peace. But war conducted for the sake of peace was, for Kant as for his predecessors in the ‘just war’ tradition, a paradigm of legitimate belligerence.”
Immanuel Kant wrote Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch in 1787. In this essay he argues for a League of Nations committed to the upholding of international law, to establish peace between nations.Three key elements appear:

  1. The state is to be viewed as a moral person;
  2. The earth is deemed to be originally owned by all; and
  3. Perpetual peace ought to be the goal for humanity.

The demand for universal peace is the final end of Kant’s doctrine of the Right – it is what reason dictates should be the proper condition of humanity, a universalisable categorical imperative, and hence all other acts should defer to it. This is an application of Kant’s third formula or principle of autonomy – act as though you were a law-maker in a kingdom of ends. However, in this article Roger Scruton argues that a condition of perpetual peace is that member nations are republics. In the case of tyrannies like Saddam Hussein’s, there is still a requirement to go to war to protect the innocent, and Kantian ethics gives us a solid rational basis for a just war theory.
Read Roger Scruton’s arguments here

See also Dr Alexander Moseley’s excellent summary of Kant’s argument.







Past Questions

Disclaimer. Inducit Learning Ltd. is not responsible for any content outside of the domain. If you are a rights holder and you think we have breached your copright, please email the editor and we will remove it.